 |
I've been testing Profound for our agency's GEO service. Wasn't bad tool. But for $99/mo with $399/mo for each client… well, for me, testing didn't prove the prices to feel justified. While scrolling on linkedin, I encountered a post about Rankinai.io, and since it had a free plan, I decided it give it a try. Heads up, the post will be a long read, so there's a quick comparison snapshot before I get into the details.
Where Profound fell short for me 1) Tracking issue that I ran into: First thing that confused me: a prompt execution showed a banner reading "Audi is not mentioned" with 0% visibility. But when I checked the actual response text. it had Audi mentioned multiple times. That's the base functionality of the tool, and it got that wrong in front of me. Profound AI response (bug with mention rate) It did correct itself a few hours later, but that first look had me genuinely rereading it, thinking I was missing something. 2) Learning curve is high for AI agents AI agents, well, I feel that it's really a powerful feature if you have the capacity to learn it. I asked their AI builder to create an agent that will analyze top-cited pages and offer content ideas to close that gap. But it didn't pull cited pages and just returned generic buyer questions instead. Not what I needed. So, if you want to create your own agents, you need to spend some time configuring it. Answere Engine Insights (a few hours lates) 3) Sentiment profile building A small thing that bugged me at the beginning was that building a sentiment profile can take up to a week. And sentiment is gathered only from prompts assigned specifically for that (at first I missed doing that). That's okay, i was just curious to look at it from the start. 4) No website audit features There is no audit for your website for AI-friendliness and GEO requirements. There are some agent templates, but no built-in site audit. You need to build your own agent or use existing templates, and the ones I found weren't exactly what i needed. Audit templates – Profound's agents 5) Price is very high for multi-brand tracking To get past ChatGPT-only tracking, you're at $399 per month. And for that price you only get 100 unique prompts, 3 engines (ChatGPT, Google AI overview, Perplexity), 3 seats included, and 3 content briefs per month. What made me switch to Rankin AI I started with a free plan. After that initial testing, I then purchased the smallest paid plan it see full capabilities. 1) Advanced features even from the entry plan The plan for $ 39 already included 4 LLM models, 35 prompts, site audit, content generation, and more. And the core AI visibility metrics tracking is solid. Rankin AI's AI search analytics dashboard 2) Very deep sentiment analysis Their sentiment feature breaks things down by specific attribute (for example, for Audi it was "reliability" "value" and so on), whatever is relevant to the category. And it also shows exactly where named competitor is ahead or behind you on each one, with score deltas. 3) Content and idea generation In this tool, to get content ideas for closing AI visibility gaps, all you need is one click. And you get a long list of actionable suggestions. Content generation capabilities of Rankin AI Each suggestion in the list clearly explains what specific gap it closes. I select what I want to work on, and then it creates a brief. After selecting what I like, it generates the full content piece. Generated content piece to cover sentiment attribute gap 4) Site audit for pages I can run it on a page for my domain and get EEAT and tech breakdown. Plus, what I liked even more, it's a report with a list of all identified tech issues, content gaps, and EEAT weak spots. 5) Agency plan is way more affordable at scale Tiers for agencies were a deal-breaker. For example, for 5 clients on Profound (399/mo per client workspace), it would cost us ~$2k/mo. For that, we'd get:
Rankin AI's entry tier is 199/mo for 10K credits. But if we apply a similar number of executions, it will be 399/mo for 45K credits.
The gap is insane! Also, Rankin AI actually offers more flexibility. For each brand, you can select weekly/daily tracking, how many AI providers you want, and how many prompts. What the alternative still lacks I'll be honest, it doesn't have some features that Profounf offers. There is no AI agent builder, no GA4 integration, and the biggest one, no live bot tracking. So if you want custom automation pipelines, it's not for you. But if you need a clean, actionable tool that tracks your AI visibility, identifies your issues and gaps, and then tells you clearly what to fix, improve, and create. Rankin AI does it out of the box. That's what we needed, and it fully covers what we needed to launch our GEO service. Anyone mid-evaluation between AI visibility tools right now? Happy to answer whatever I can. submitted by /u/isblue_ to r/Rankin_AI |
Source: r/Rankin_AI · by /u/isblue_