HARRY & MARKLE ARE CONVINCED THIS ABOUT WILLIAM DO YOU AGREE?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ApF7JvvoWk
Today is Harry's birthday.
But it hasn't been a happy birthday at all. Harry hasn't had one since he said "I do" in 2018.
For Harry, everything lately has turned into a battle for popularity. The problem is, he thinks he is competing against William. But no—he is competing, first and foremost, against his own wife.
For her own birthday, she chooses the images she wants to show. For Harry’s birthday, she chooses the images she wants to show. She is always the star of the show.
Claw’s word is final, no matter who is standing before her—whether it be Harry or Queen Elizabeth herself.
Claw cannot stand it when Harry gets invited first, greeted first, or when people want to talk to him first.
If last week was bad, this one isn't looking any better. Harry has events—*he* does, not Claw. Claw isn't required at any of these events; in fact, she isn't expected to attend any of them.
Harry hopes that seeing him operate within that sphere—charitable organizations and all that—this time around will lead KC3 to make amends for having insulted him by calling him a "private citizen."
The more I write about it, the more I want to give him the Lucille treatment.
I mean, Harry is making such a huge drama out of being called "citizen." It’s not like we’re in 1790s France.
Harry is slipping back into total desperation mode. Because he—you know—wanted to reinvent himself as Prince Liam Neeson.
But it turns out that William and Kate are set to reunite this very week with someone who actually performs acrobatics.
It was announced on Monday, Sept. 14, that the Wales will attend the world premiere of Cruise’s latest film, Digger, at the ODEON Luxe Leicester Square on Tuesday, Sept. 22, supporting the U.K.’s Film and TV Charity.
The thing is, Sean already said the press was facing a dilemma of its own: where to go.
Well, it seems the press has one less problem now. Harry will be attending practically all these events alone. The only one Claw would likely want to attend is the event with the Clintons, but she has absolutely no desire to go to the others. She is terrified of the reception she would get.
Harry wants to behave well and dress better this time, and he wants his team to be mindful of the press, because he wants to show the King that he can handle royal duties.
Claw has absolutely no desire to do the work of a royal; she only wants the connections, not the duty. Claw and Harry are sticking to the strategy Sean said they would adopt: first, Harry would drive a wedge into the British Royal Family—using the children to do so—and once they were inside, Claw would have to be included as well.
The thing is, no matter what the Harkles do, nothing—absolutely nothing—tops this moment.
COTSWOLDS DRAMA – WHAT YOU DON'T KNOW
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wllWPSeeUTI
Ever since I’ve been following this saga, I have never ceased to be amazed by the Harkles' enormous capacity to ruin the simplest things.
But the school bus route thing… it’s just a whole new level of idiocy. I’ve spent the entire day using that word to describe it: idiocy.
I mean, seriously—you hire a so-called security team to give you a report on the risks you face… and not one of these great experts thought about school-day traffic?
Here in Chile, they even have a name for it: "Super." If kids start classes on a Wednesday (don't ask me to explain that, because I don't get it—I just thank God I don't have to go to school), the news calls it "Super Wednesday," and they spend at least two weeks talking about it before it happens. So, we all know that between 7:30 and 8:30, you either put up with the traffic or you walk.
I used to walk. I’d much rather walk to wherever I needed to go, because I once had the terrible idea of taking the car at that time of day… three hours. I’m not kidding—it took me three hours to get to the office. And don't even get me started on the afternoon—the traffic between 7 and 8 PM… Seriously, what is wrong with that security team?
Today, many people recalled the time Kate, while pregnant with Louis, got stuck in the school run traffic. Some people said, "She could have just run the red light." No, that’s not how it works. The Waleses only have a blue-light escort—and all that entails—when they are heading to public engagements. Only then do they bypass traffic, thanks to that privilege. But that is for security reasons: precisely because of the public event, their whereabouts are known. In their day-to-day lives, however, they don't have that kind of escort. So, Kate has often found herself stuck in the school run traffic.
That makes what Harry and Claw set up today even more stupid. If Ravec were providing security, it wouldn't be to take the two kids to school. That isn't Ravec's job.
Sean says we shouldn't buy the Chris Ship story; we already know where it comes from and who told it. In reality, the whole thing was a test—a test run along that route. And it didn't involve children. Claw wasn't in that convoy, either. Claw doesn't drop the kids off at school; nannies and bodyguards do that.
Now, according to what Sean says, it seems the whole thing was indeed a bid for attention. Sean claims there was no police report, nor the massive drama that has been portrayed. The Harkles called to notify the school simply because they cannot bear being ignored.
The funny thing is that the current Foreign Secretary, Ed Miliband, lives in that school's neighborhood; he has two children—born in 2009 and 2010—who are 17 and 16 and still in school. In other words, people in the area are used to seeing cars with tinted windows, police, and so on.
Now, what surprises many people is that 5- and 7-year-old children go to a school more than an hour away from their own home. I mean, do you realize what that means? Anyone who has had children knows.
I'm going to put this the way Sean says it:
"Now what was interesting was when they went along to see, and I know exactly where the school is, and they have to be very careful about what they say regarding the school, because consequently that could have a knock-on effect. You could lose potential clients, you know, people wanting to put their children into that because of the difficulties of getting there. Everything comes down to money and prestige, and, of course, how it looks in the big public domain. They have at this particular point been very careful to reiterate that the school have been wonderful, very understanding, very daunting for the children, right very daunting, because ultimately they were promised the school now they're not going"
I’m not entirely sure, but I get the impression that Sean is saying the school officials will keep their mouths shut about the whole affair for their own benefit… yet the Harkles don't intend to cast blame on the school either, because it doesn't suit their interests. What could have happened?
It sounds like Sean is saying something happened—though not on the scale of what went down with Vance over the summer. Also, the Harkles only had two cars with them, but something did happen, because they complained to someone about the slow-moving traffic.
Oh, what idiots!
According to Sean's sources, there are photos from that moment. The way Sean tells it, it sounds like paparazzi were involved, but then he implies otherwise. Sean isn't sure, but it seems Harry took them—a point Sean highlights by recalling the major chaos the Harkles caused in New York.
It seems Harry really wants to use this absurd matter in the RAVEC security review.
That said, Sean argues—and here I have to agree—that providing security for Harry would be electoral suicide. Looking at other situations, the fact is that ceding ground to Mr. Whinges and Mrs. Lies would practically amount to handing the office of Prime Minister to the opposition.
And this topic really bothers Sean, because here we go—Sean is in 😈😈😈 mode.
Now, I ask you this. If of course you are a private citizen, who else gets that level of security? And if you're so concerned about security, who's dim enough to put in that you killed 25 people into a book? You are because you wanted the money, so you had to come up with the ante.
Answer:
EX MINISTER NOW ATTACKS 13 YR OLD PRINCE GEORGE WHY¿
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FuCAOw8l1Rw
In the midst of all this, Nicola Sturgeon, who really should also keep quiet for a few centuries, decided to give an interview to BBC Breakfast.
Amidst all this, Nicola Sturgeon—who really ought to keep quiet for a few centuries herself—decided to give an interview to *BBC Breakfast*, following one she had given to ITV’s Julia Etchingham.
Judging by press reports, the question is: which one was worse?
It all revolves around the fact that Nicola Sturgeon is publishing her political memoirs. She received a substantial advance for them. As it turned out, the publisher didn't make a good deal, since sales haven't been high. And that is understandable, if you know who Sturgeon is and why she is no longer Scotland's First Minister.
But—and it’s not just Sean saying this; I see it too—Nicola remembers practically nothing. She likely doesn't remember when she appeared in Sean's studio for an interview with Andrew Neil wearing Louis Vuitton shoes; Sean asked if she knew how much they were worth, and she replied that she didn't feel secure unless she was wearing them.
J.K. Rowling mocked Sturgeon for wearing these £4,000 shoes. And I agree with Rowling on this.
However, she did weigh in on George.
Nicola stated in the Channel 4 documentary *The Royals: Time To Go*, hosted by John Humphrys, that the monarchy should be abolished to free Prince George from the burden of becoming king. She said it was unfair for the 13-year-old prince to have no control over his destiny, and suggested that abolishing the monarchy would be a considerate gesture.
I focus the Sturgeon affair on two narratives that—surprise, surprise!—are the very ones Harry holds.
- The "Trapped" Narrative: Media coverage and political commentators quickly linked Sturgeon’s arguments to Harry’s famous 2021 sit-down interview with Oprah Winfrey. In that interview, Harry explicitly stated that he, his father, and his brother were all "trapped within the system" of the royal family. Sturgeon echoed this sentiment, stating that growing up under such pressure can lead to "dysfunctional adults".
- Past Support for Harry: This is not the first time Sturgeon has weighed in on Harry. Following the release of his memoir Spare, Sturgeon publicly voiced her "admiration" for Harry, suggesting that the public infighting and the trauma exposed by his departure from royal duties served as a strong "argument for republicanism"
I won’t list the comments people have made here against Sturgeon—and especially against the BBC—not because they aren't deserved, but because they touch on political issues. However, a recurring complaint is that the interviewers didn't want to put Sturgeon on the spot, particularly regarding the matter of her husband—is he still her husband?—Peter Murrell. People were annoyed that Sturgeon spoke at length against JK Rowling and the British Royal Family, yet didn't say a single word about what her husband did or about their divorce.
Many people saw that Sturgeon tried to stir up controversy over the JK Rowling and George issues so that people wouldn't focus on the fact that she dodged the questions she was supposed to answer.
Sean is right: no one is remembering Sturgeon with respect. And stirring up controversy of this kind does nothing to help her image.
And in my case, a politician who sympathizes with Harry and believes he is right about something no longer deserves my attention.
FEUD FALL OUT’S & NOW THIS UTTER SHAMBLES BEHIND THE SCENES STAFF SPEAK
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zI-Eh-7yyQ
The staff at Montecito always faced the same problem.
Claw would ask them, "What do you think?" and the staff wouldn't know what to say. What can you say to Claw when she had already decided that whatever *she* said was what was going to happen?
It’s like when your mom asks what you want to eat, but in the end, you wind up eating whatever she decided to make for lunch.
And that’s what happened with "As Ever"—which was the name before American Riviera Orchard. No one on the team liked any of the names, but when Claw asked, "What do you think?", she had already had letterhead and other materials made. How do you respond to that?
That’s why the Harkles have a revolving door of staff. It’s unbearable to work for people like that.
Claw wasted millions on this "As Ever" venture. Nothing works. And to make matters worse, instead of stopping and admitting the mistake, she attacked Martha Stewart.
Martha—the one who actually succeeded, and continues to succeed, where Claw failed.
And the battle isn't over for Claw, because the British and US editions of *Vogue* want Martha. She still draws a massive audience. The new editor, however, wanted Claw. But no—Claw doesn't attract anyone; Martha does. Whether the magazine will actually sell well is another matter, but the fact remains: Martha sells better than Claw.
Source: r/SaintMeghanMarkle · by /u/Human-Economics6894